As well as a £3.8bn transfer of commissioning
money to local authorities, the Spending Review has brought with it a c10%
reduction in NHS administration costs.
This is significant for CCGs, providers and patients.
CCG life is getting busier. We have an ever increasing need for quality
assurance, are completing new pathways and leading urgent and integrated care
boards with partners.
We have significant public engagement and
are active members of Health and Wellbeing boards. We meet regularly with providers, local
clinicians and (of course) report regularly to NHS England area teams.
We are responsible for commissioning
budgets which effectively reduce over time with a need to make significant
efficiencies - and we are expected to improve quality across primary, secondary
and community care.
I
remain optimistic. Clinical involvement
in commissioning is delivering.
But we need to be realistic about
resources. The £25 running cost is
already too blunt a tool, not taking into account size of organisation or local
health needs. The commissioning system
has already lost a significant number of experienced staff and is more
fragmented. CCGs are already incredibly
lean. Discretionary effort is part of
the job description. There’s a point
where a lean organization becomes an ineffective one. Patients, and the NHS, needs CCGs to
succeed.
A cut to running costs will make some
unsustainable.
CCGs are part of the front line, developing
new services, walking the wards and reviewing vulnerable patients in nursing
homes. Their strength is their level of
clinical engagement and local knowledge.
Some suggest mergers as the answer. Their size is determined by local
patient flows, by local authority boundaries, by consultation with members and
patients. Did large PCTs perform better
than smaller ones after their reorganisation?
Commissioning needs to be local, proactive
and patient focused. Primary care is
already feeling the effect of a more fragmented, transactional approach to its
own commissioning. Regulation is
important but is not the answer to many of the problems facing the NHS.
Let’s get commissioners and providers
talking, resource them both to do so, and deliver the rewards in efficiency and
service quality.
Agree entirely Steve - accept need for financial efficiency but CCGs receive significantly less funding than was given to PCTs and must work in a more complex regulatory environment, with a wider group of stakeholders, and with increased involvement of high value but high cost clinical input. CCGs can only rise to the challenge of system transformation if they are properly funded to manage change.
ReplyDelete